Good Idea/ Bad Idea: Piazza Delivery?

There's no point in doing a summary on whether Bonds or Clemens belong in the HoF without looking at steroids.  It's a waste of time because the answer is yes.  So, lets look at a guy that I've heard some debate about in Mike Piazza.

I was kinda shocked that there was debate about him.  I know he was mentioned in Radomski's book, but I don't really trust him.

Good Idea: When thinking of Mike Piazza, the term "Best Offensive Catcher in History" is usually right behind.  As it should be.  His 141 wRC+ blows away any other catcher's number, including Bench and Fisk.  He also trumps all other HoF catchers in: Slugging, OPS, HR, ISO, and wRAA.  And a lot of the other stats (OBP, wOBA, AVG, etc) he may not be at the top, but he's pretty close to it.  I don't see a reason why Piazza should NOT be in the Hall of Fame.

Bad Idea:  Anyone else remember Piazza trying to play defense behind the plate?  It was a comedy of errors.  In fact, his TZ rating is the worst for any HoF catcher, as is his Fld+Pos score (which takes into account the difficulty of the position in that era).  He was a great offensive catcher, but was not a defensive one and that is probably more important for his position.  If he were a LF, we wouldn't be having this discussion.  He doesn't belong.

Verdict: Mikey gets the highest score ever for a catcher.  Better than Bench, better than Berra.  His offense was that good.  Best offensive catcher in history.  That's all the writers need to think of when it comes to voting for Piazza.  Best.  Offensive.  Catcher.  In.  History.  Put him in.

The only question should be: Dodgers cap or Mets Cap.  I pick Mets cap, mostly because of this one moment:

Probably his biggest HR of his career.  It was a glorious moment and I was glad I got to watch it happen.

David Wright, the Golden Boy in Blue and Orange.

There have been rumors of the Mets tossing out contract offers to David Wright trying to extend their 29 year old 3rd baseman. He had a great year offensively as most would expect. His power wasn’t exactly overwhelming, but he did have 21 knocks with a .306 batting average and a .391 OBP. The question I’m posing is, in Wright’s shoes, why/why not accept a solid offer from the Mets? The comparables are obvious with Ryan Zimmerman and Evan Longoria having both signed six year 100 million dollar extensions in recent memory. Both were however multiple years from free agency, and on winning franchises.

Wright is for better or worse, the face of the New York Mets for at least one more season. He does control how much longer he is part of that dumpster fire however, and could opt to take his show on the road after the season, possibly parking himself in a city where a .500 record isn’t a monumental achievement, but is instead a disappointment of the highest order. Hell, he’s already in a city that follows that mantra he just happens to be in the wrong borough. Wright has been almost as rock solid as a player can be, having only missed significant time once in his career. He also plays well above average defense at 3rd, which isn’t exactly amazing, but when coupled with his above average bat, and his solid pop makes Wright an incredible threat. Wright could very easily decline to talk contracts with the Mets until they show dedication to making the team competitive, or the season is over.

The debate for Wright will hinge squarely on how much he values the stability of the new contract vs the potential for a bigger contract with a contending team. Obviously the Yankees, Nationals, Tigers, and Rays are locked into long term 3rd base commitments, however the Dodgers, Phillies, Red Sox, Orioles, Angels, and White Sox could all be potential suitors for the impending free agent. Wright has stated his intention to play his entire career with the Mets, and that in and of itself is commendable, however he will be sacrificing money, and potentially his chance at winning a world series to play for the city’s junior team. Wright may also be somewhat burned by the fact that so much has been written about what he has stated as his preference to be private negotiations between him and the team. Some if not all of that may be the team jockeying to get the contract negotiations handled quickly, it may also be Wright’s agent trying to find a way to gain leverage with the team, this has only served to ruffle Wright’s feathers however, and may not positively impact the negotiations regardless of who has made the information public.

Ultimately I think Wright will resign with the Mets, though I question whether or not he would be willing to take less money over the life of the contract, or take significant deferrals to keep the annual spending limit more reasonable for the team and see them spend at another position of need. Wright would find himself a very lucrative contract on the open market, there’s no doubt there, but how much is enough from the team that he’s played with his whole career? Will Wright be more concerned with his pay check, or his team’s long term flexibility is yet to be seen, however Wright may be saying all the right things publically but is secretly preparing himself for the free agent market next season. the 7 year extension he’s reportedly seeking is certainly possible given his history of durability and reliable play but whether or not he’ll price himself out for his current team is ultimately a very real possibility. The Mets are not contenders right now and signing a few players long term may not be the correct path to take for a rebuilding team. If Wright takes a contract from the Mets I’d expect it to run longer than the 6 years his comparables have received given his proximity to free agency but I doubt that the Mets front office is smart enough to frontload the contract and may hamstring themselves down the road with an aging third baseman on a big money contract. 7 years, 120MM is certainly possible but that doesn’t leave the team with as much payroll flexibility as they need to compete.

Mets: Extending Dickey?

The Mets are obviously going to exercise their $5 million option on pitcher R.A. Dickey, and they have openly stated that they would like to extend the knuckleballer, but that creates a few questions. How many years should they offer a 38 year old pitcher? How much should they offer a knuckleball pitcher per year? How different is Dickey from a typical knuckleballer?

Many people will tell you that throwing a knuckleball isn’t as strenuous for the pitcher as a curveball or a slider. That is true to a point, but there are a lot more variables here than that. The equation isn’t simply “knuckleball = no elbow trouble”, and Dickey’s average velocity on his knuckleball is this season, 13 mph faster than Tim Wakefield’s career average. While Wake through his knuckler about 64 mph Dickey’s pitch according to fangraphs is running about 77 on average, his fastball as well sits in the mid 80s. He’s not your prototypical “put it up there and see what he can do with it” knuckleballer, because of the speed of his pitch Dickey is more accurately able to place the pitch and its movements are more subtle. Dickey is kind of the “new breed” of knuckleball pitcher, and has over the past 3 years been a very effective, often dominant starter.

The hardest thing to have take in here is that there is no real comparable here. Dickey isn’t like any other pitchers. Dickey is statistically an outlier, most pitchers don’t suddenly become dominant at 36, most knuckleballers aren’t dominant, and most dominant pitchers don’t throw over 90% of their pitches between 77 and 84 mph. We have to look at Dickey in broad strokes: He’s a recently dominant right handed starter, he’s giving his team a lot of innings per year, He’s 38 years old, and he throws the least controllable pitch in major league baseball around 80% of the time. Putting all of that together it’s a hard list to figure. If he threw like Mike Mussina at the same age, 14mil for 1 year with a team option for another 14+ wouldn’t be out of the question. If his track record were more consistent (prior to his Mets tenure) the same could likely be said. He is however instead a ridiculously dominant knuckleballer nearing 40 years old. I don’t know if his annual will be any higher than 10, maybe 12 million but he has an outside shot at a 3 year extension with an option for a 4th year. Could the Mets get clever and use Tim Wakefield’s previous contract model? A recurring option for a set price? Would Dickey be interested in that kind of cost certainty without any real promise of continued employment year to year, maybe the buyout would need to be rather high, around ½ of the annual salary?

While I like Dickey as a pitcher, I have some (I believe understandable) reservations about him. I think he has found his groove, he locates an unlocatable pitch, he’s been healthy, and he hasn’t shown any particular slip in his productivity, in fact his FIP this season is significantly lower than it was over either of the previous two seasons. He does however live and die by the most volatile pitch in baseball, if he develops a mechanical issue, “correcting” it might not be enough to get him back to who he is today. When a power pitcher starts getting out ahead of his pitches and starts letting fastballs sail too high, it can be corrected, when a finesse pitcher loses their arm slot and their slider only moves laterally it can be corrected, but when a knuckleball doesn’t exist within the perfect storm that makes it effective, it’s a BP fastball or it becomes a wild pitch. While he is a knuckleballer, and empirical evidence shows that if you throw a knuckleball you can throw forever, or at least until you get tired of playing baseball for money, Dickey throws it a lot harder than average which could make him the unfortunate exception to that rule.

All of that said, if I were in the Mets front office I might be willing to try to strike a pretty aggressive deal, a 3 year extension, for 32 mil, broken down as 12, 10, 10, followed by a recurring team option for 6 mil with a 2.5 mil buyout. If you were in Dickey’s shoes, would that be enough to put your name on paper?

Justin Upton: Does He Fit For The Mets?

The Diamondbacks have grown tired of Justin Upton’s attitude and his behavior, so much so that they have now resolved to potentially trade him for some package of either high ranking prospects or “major league ready” talent. The Pirates have been linked to both Upton and Carlos Quentin. The Pirates are certainly a viable destination for either player, but they may not be a solid participant in the Upton sweepstakes, they just don’t have the pieces that Arizona is looking for. Of course they could always try to overwhelm the D-Backs with a large pack of prospects, but there are other teams who could use a right handed outfielder with power and “speed” (8 caught stealing in 18 attempts isn’t exactly going to impress me). 

One of our local sports talk personalities Bruce Jacobs, who is openly a Mets fan proposed the idea of trading a package consisting of Lucas Duda, one of Kirk Nieuwenhuis (good lord was that hard to spell) or Jordany Valdespin, and a mid tier prospect largely of the D-back’s choosing. I don’t think this is an overwhelmingly poor offer on Jacobs’ part. I think that it would be giving up too much for the return, especially if Nieuwenhuis were involved. A great deal of Jacobs’ argument centered around the notion that the Mets need a righty power hitter, and thus their glut of lefty bats could be used to their advantage. Now, much more than looking for offense, the Mets need bullpen help, but regardless of a “needs vs. wants” argument I think that this would be an overpay, potentially a necessary one if they are dead set on prying Upton away from the D-backs and there are other serious suitors, but at the moment it appears like that should be the absolute high water mark for an offer. Perhaps more fitting would be Valdespin and 2 prospects allowing the Mets to flip Ike Davis for a reliever and move Duda to first. Slight decrease in power overall, without sacrificing two batters who are 20-30 homer threats under team control for quite a while.

I feel like Upton’s value is being played up too greatly, he has speed on some level, but either his speed is diminishing already at 24 years old, or he’s not making smart baserunning decisions. He has 20-25 home run power, not 30. His high water mark is 31 homers last season in a modestly hitter friendly home park, moving to Citi field would suck a lot of that power away in a hurry, closer fences or not. I understand a 20-20 hitter is a valuable commodity, but he’s also being touted as an excellent defender, which depending on the metrics you put stock in could be seen as an absolute fabrication or complete truth. Upton’s trade value is probably higher than someone like Nick Swisher’s, but defensively he is (again metric dependent) only marginally better than Swish in right and doesn’t present the same kind of threat at the plate that Swish does. Arguably, he may continue to get stronger over the next few years, possibly becoming a 30 hr threat, but giving up two average outfielders with 15 + homer power or one with power and one with what appears to be very good baserunning acumen on top of a prospect just seems like too much of an overpay after looking things over, especially in light of the Mets actual needs in the bullpen.

As an aside, whoever acquires Justin at the deadline should investigate what BJ will cost in free agency after the season. Having the Upton brothers on the same team would (potentially) elevate them both. They have both been criticized for taking plays off in the field, for making bonehead mistakes on the basepaths, but what of an outfield with both BJ Upton in center and Justin in right? With that much speed you may be able to put David Ortiz in left and still have league average outfield defense.


Overall, could the Mets pull off the trade? Sure. Would it help enough to bother? Probably not this year.

New York Mets: Amazing Rotation, or Amazing Mess?

In yet another edition of my starting rotation analysis we’re going to take a look at the New York Mets. Now, go ahead and think back to the offseason, if I had told you then that the Mets would not only be above .500 after 36 games, but that they would have the same record as the Yankees, and a better record than the Phillies, the Red Sox, The Angels, and the Tigers, would you have laughed at me? I would have, and you should have. However, and I’m borrowing from John Sterling here, “You can’t predict baseball”. Here we are, and the Mets are sitting at 20-17 as of this writing. The team’s rotation is a lock to do all of one thing: scare Mets fans.

Dillon Gee has managed to eek out three quality starts so far, and has in the other 4 starts, only once made it out of the 6th inning. To his credit, he’s made it into the 6th in every start, which for a lot of young starters is something to hang their hat on. Now, to be fair to Gee, his BABIP is sitting at .351 which is high despite his 21% line drive rate. He is forcing batters to put the ball on the ground pretty well (over 50% of the time) and he’s only giving up 25% of hits for extra bases. Gee will probably come around some, and his BABIP will come down to earth and he might well look respectable by the end of the year.

Jonathon Niese has never before tasted anything greater than mediocrity. He has been a league average or worse pitcher on some league average or worse Mets teams since making his debut in ‘08. Niese has managed to look almost like a different pitcher this year, going 6+ innings in all of his first 4 starts (all of them quality) before the wheels fell right off in Houston giving up 5 earned runs in 3 innings, which was followed up by a lack luster (but not awful) start in Philly before he was able to right the ship and threw 6 shutout innings against the Marlins. I would be worried that Niese is more the pitcher he has been over his career than he’s the pitcher that his solid 3.40 ERA and 1.235 WHIP make him out to be.  His BABIP is at .261, which is 70 points lower than his career average, and none of his peripherals imply that that will continue. He’s giving up almost the same line drive percentage as last year, and is only forcing ground balls marginally better than last season, He is also walking more batters than ever before. If the increase in groundball rate can be sustained he might be able to get away with a few extra walks here and there, but I think Niese is going to regress as the season wears on.

R.A. Dickey has started this season off pretty well, if not quite as good as he’s been over the past 2 seasons in New York. Dickey is of course a knuckleball pitcher, and with that can come huge fluctuations from game to game in performance. That’s not to say that no other pitchers have off days, just that when a knuckleball doesn’t break, it moves like a BP fastball and often gets hit just as hard. Atlanta took advantage of just such an outing belting 3 home runs off Dickey in 4 and ⅓ innings of work to give them a nice healthy 8 runs back on April 18th. Dickey is walking, and striking out about 2% more batters than last year, and is giving up homers about twice as often, having given up 7 dingers in 7 starts. Fact is that it’s hard to say what a knuckleball pitcher will do from year to year, let alone from start to start. I don’t think Dickey will be bad this year at all, but to say that he’ll put together a 2010 like season again would be equally unlikely. Somewhere in the area of slightly below and slightly above league average seem like the safest bets you can make with an established knuckleballer, and that’s what I’d expect from Dickey.

Mike Pelfrey got off to an excellent start, and will be out now until the early part of next season for Tommy John surgery. So, what was looking like a promising start for Pelfrey, and could have been enough to have the Mets seriously considering extension talks will instead be a year of rehabbing his elbow and hoping that he can pick up next season where he left off.

Johan Santana is back, and is ready to make good on the last few years of his Mets contract. So far Santana has been excellent, after being limited to 5 innings in his first 2 outings, Johan imploded in Atlanta, going 1 and ⅓ innings giving up 6 runs (4 earned) on 55 pitches. Since then he has provided the Mets with 5 consecutive quality starts. Santana is back to his Cy Young years in strikeout rate (more than a strikeout per inning pitched), and though he’ll likely be limited in his innings total, he could look to put together a very good year, and be the one truly stable part of the Mets rotation. Santana’s giving up more fly balls than he has in 9 years, but I’d be hard pressed to start telling people to panic there. He’s recently come back from surgery, he’s looking dominant, and the rest will probably straighten itself out over the course of the year. I’d expect a rough start here or there as he makes adjustments, but I have trouble seeing anything but quality out of Santana by the end of the season.

Miguel Batista appears to be the heir apparent to take over Pelfrey’s spot in the rotation and has so far been the definition of okay this season. He’s pitching to a 4.26 ERA between starting and relieving, but managed a 7 inning 4 hit shutout in his last outing. The 41 year old Journeyman might just have a few tricks left up his sleeve. His BABIP (.329) is higher than his career average (.298), but he’s given his age and that he’ll be starting rather than relieving, that might not be too far out of line. It doesn’t look like he’s making any real changes from what he did last year, and if that means that he’ll be a roughly league average to slightly below average starter, the Mets will probably live with it, especially if they start to fall out of contention as the year wears on. The biggest question at this point may be whether or not he’s going to be able to hold down the back of the rotation all year, and that’s a fair concern, he’s 41 years old, and hasn’t started more than 5 games in a season since 2008. On the whole, there’s not a ton you can expect from Batista, and given his contract, if the Mets start looking to upgrade their rotation, he’s likely to be the odd man out by mid season.

The Mets are currently in place for the last wildcard spot in the NL, and while it’s far, far too early to say that they will be making a playoff appearance this season if they can keep winning despite a middling/weak rotation, and a questionable bullpen they might be a team to watch at the trade deadline. I don’t know that their lineup can continue to carry their pitching staff, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they started to come back down to earth in a hurry, but for the time being it’s got to be a nice feeling as a Mets fan to see your team doing something worth watching.